This paper was originally reviewed and published in the Meta Research Bulletin, Volume 10, Number 3, September 15, by Meta Research, Inc, a scientific non-profit corporation dedicated to supporting promising but unpopular alternative ideas in astronomy. The Great Pyramid at Giza Abstract: It is proposed that it is a plutonium mill. Its perfection of construction and choice of materials are compared against all other pyramids.
This notion is reflected in Egyptian art and historical inscriptions. It is uncertain why these rights existed for the woman in Egypt but no where else in the ancient world. It may well be that such rights were ultimately related to the theoretical role of the king in Egyptian society.
If the pharaoh was the personification of Egypt, and he represented the corporate personality of the Egyptian state, then men and women might not have been seen in their familiar relationships, but rather, only in regard to this royal center of society.
Since Egyptian national identity would have derived from all people sharing a common relationship with the king, then in this relationship, which all men and women shared equally, they were--in a sense--equal to each other. This is not to say that Egypt was an egalitarian society. Legal distinctions in Egypt were apparently based much more upon differences in the social classes, rather than differences in gender.
Rights and privileges were not uniform from one class to another, but within the given classes, it seems that equal economic and legal rights were, for the most part, accorded to both men and women.
Most of the textual and archaeological evidence for the role of women that survives from prior to the New Kingdom pertains to the elite, not the common folk. At this time, it is the elite, for the most part, who leave written records or who can afford tombs that contain such records.
However, from the New Kingdom onward, and certainly by the Ptolemaic Period, such evidence pertains more and more to the non-elite, i. Actually, the bulk of the evidence for the economic freedom of Egyptian women derives from the Ptolemaic Period. Both Egyptian and Greek systems of law and social traditions existed side-by-side in Egypt at that time.
Greeks functioned within their system and Egyptians within theirs. Mixed parties of Greeks and Egyptians making contractual agreements or who were forced into court over legal disputes would choose which of the two legal systems in which they would base their settlements.
Ironically, while the Egyptians were the subjugated people of their Greek rulers, Egyptian women, operating under the Egyptian system, had more privileges and civil rights than the Greek women living in the same society, but who functioned under the more restrictive Greek social and legal system.
From the bulk of the legal documents, we know that women could manage and dispose of private property, including: A woman could administer all her property independently and according to her free will.
She could conclude any kind of legal settlement. She could appear as a contracting partner in a marriage contract or a divorce contract; she could execute testaments; she could free slaves; she could make adoptions.
She was entitled to sue at law. It is highly significant that a woman in Egypt could do all of the above and initiate litigation in court freely without the need of a male representative. This amount of freedom was at variance with that of the Greek woman who required a designated male, called a kourios, to represent or stand for her in all legal contracts and proceedings.
This male was her husband, father or brother. Most frequently, she received it as gifts or as an inheritance from her parents or husband, or else, she received it through purchases--with goods which she earned either through employment, or which she borrowed.
Under Egyptian property law, a woman had claim to one-third of all the community property in her marriage, i. When a woman brought her own private property to a marriage e. However, in the event of divorce her property had to be returned to her, in addition to any divorce settlement that might be stipulated in the original marriage contract.
A wife was entitled to inherit one-third of that community property on the death of her husband, while the other two-thirds was divided among the children, followed up by the brothers and sisters of the deceased.
To circumvent this possibility and to enable his wife to receive either a larger part of the share, or to allow her to dispose of all the property, a husband could do several things: As a living will, it was made and perhaps executed while the husband was still alive.
In this will, the husband would assign to his wife what he wished of his own private property, i. An example of this is the imyt-pr of Wah from el-Lahun. Even if he had other children, he could still adopt his wife, so that, as his one of his legal offspring, she would receive some of the two-thirds share, in addition to her normal one-third share of the community property.
A woman was free to bequeath property from her husband to her children or even to her own brothers and sisters unless there was some stipulation against such in her husband's will. One papyrus tells us how a childless woman, who after she inherited her husband's estate, raised the three illegitimate children who were born to him and their female household slave such liaisons were fairly common in the Egyptian household and seem to have borne no social stigma.
She then married the eldest illegitimate step-daughter to her younger brother, whom she adopted as her son, that they might receive the entire inheritance.
A woman could also freely disinherit children of her private property, i. She could selectively bequeath that property to certain children and not to others. Such action is recorded in the Will of Naunakht. Self-enslavement in Egypt was actually a form of indentured servitude.
Although self-enslavement appears to have been illegal in Egypt, it was practiced by both men and women. To get around the illegality, the servitude was stipulated only for a limited number of years, although it was usually said to be "99 years.The Assembly or Put-Together class includes those puzzles which entail the arrangement of pieces to make specific shapes in either two or three dimensions, to mesh in a particular way (without necessarily interlocking) or to fill a container or tray.
The pieces are free to be juxtaposed in many different configurations but only one or a few arrangements will be valid solutions. How the great pyramid was real Essay by EssaySwap Contributor, College, Undergraduate, February download word file, 9 pages download word file, 9 pages 1 votes5/5(1).
The Information Awareness Office (IAO) was established by the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in January to bring together several DARPA projects focused on applying surveillance and information technology to track and monitor terrorists and other asymmetric threats to U.S.
national security by achieving "Total Information Awareness" (TIA). Free essay on The Great Pyramid of Giza available totally free at schwenkreis.com, the largest free essay community. The Great Pyramid of Giza The Great Sphinx of Giza. statue when it was erected, or even through the ages prior to its real discovery (Wikipedia, ).
It was given the name of "Sphi. Fingerprints of the Gods [Graham Hancock] on schwenkreis.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Fingerprints of the Gods is the revolutionary rewrite of history that has persuaded millions of listeners throughout the world to change their preconceptions about the history behind modern society.
An intellectual detective story. Free great pyramid papers, essays, and research papers. My Account BC. His real name was Khnum-khuf meaning 'the god Khnum is his protection.
Khufuwas the son of another great pyramid builder, King Sneferu. which was the largest pyramid built in Egypt. The essay investigates the meaning of the selected forms for the Egyptian.