The male characters carry on the official investigation while the female characters carry on their own unofficial investigation. The play opens when its five characters enter the kitchen of the Wright farmhouse. The county attorney takes charge of the investigation, guiding the sheriff and Mr. Hale in recounting their roles in the discovery of the crime.
Do things are just how they seem to be at first glance? When I just started reading the play, I caught myself on the thought that I begin to feel depressed. Interesting is the fact that the play is based upon actual events that took place in Indianola.
The details are changed, but it is obvious that the story left deeply impressed the author. Hale came to the house to investigate the accident. Men concentrated on global approach to the matter, while women were very much concerned with appearance of the house, especially kitchen.
Look at its neck! Peters had followed the whole scenario how the crime was committed including motive for the crime, while men are just rambling around seeing no evidence of what had happened in the house.
Author had written feministic play. Sex conflict is obvious. It can be because of gender differences. The play draws men brash, analytical, rough and self-concentrated and women sensitive, intuitive and deliberative.
From the first glance the story told by the author seems to be all about sex conflict, but after more thorough examination it appears to have deeper routs that go to the role of woman in the nineteenth century and the delicate verge between law and justice.
Women were considered to be created not to live for their own happiness, pleasure and joy, but that of their husbands and children.
They were taking care of the house, working in the garden and had no opportunity for expressing themselves in other ways.
After making a research, I have found that there was a literary background for this play.
Kate Chopin and Fanny Fern also paid very much attention to those issues. Everything in the world is relative. There no thing that can be totally good or bad, it just through which frame reference we explore it. Wright or her husband. From my point of view, the choice is more hidden but not less important issue of the drama.
Wright were married for about thirty years. Hale noticed about Mrs. That was before their marriage. It is nothing said about what kind of man was Mr. Wright when they first met, but evidently something was really good and attractive in him as she agreed to marry him.
It was their deliberate act.
I do not deny any prejudices of that time and probably she had no choice, but she should not at least forget about herself and do not fall in despair and try to turn the reality the way she wanted it to be.
Committing the crime is not only a legal aspect, but also a moral one, and the responsibility is on both of them. Frankly speaking I feel sorry neither for her, nor for him. Peters are not blaming Minnie for what she had done.
They understand all concomitant circumstances, including her unhappy marriage life, her lack of freedom and inability to be with things that she loved and just to be the woman. They kept silence about what they have discovered, because they knew that their proofs would just make men laugh.
Oppression and sexual discrimination of women at that time can be clearly observed. But let me return to the choice matter that I discussed earlier. Murder of the oppressive husband by his abused emotionally wife that was isolated at the remote farm- can that be justified?
And I sympathize with Minnie hundred times and her poor life with rude farmer, but I will never understand and accept the fact of what she has done. In the conclusion I would like to summarize what I have written earlier and express my personal attitude to the author and to the play itself.
I greatly enjoyed the play with its bright dialogues that helped me to understand not only general feelings of that time, but also compare relationships of men and women. I am thankful to Susan Glaspell for her efforts to show society its drawbacks, and I think that because of such women now we have adequate society with no sex discrimination and equal rights.Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" When reading a story of this nature, one must be reminded not to take horror in Poe too autobiographically.
The narrator's "nervousness" is a frequently used device of Poe to establish tone and plausibility through heightened states of consciousness. Furthermore, although Trifles is in essence a murder mystery, the play takes place in the kitchen instead of at the crime scene of the bedroom or in a more official domestic setting such as the police station.
Early in her essay, Holstein writes that Glaspell’s play Trifles is deceptive in that it seems “simple, almost inconsequential" ().
On the surface, it seems that Trifles is really only about the competing roles and perspectives of women and men. This is certainly one part, and an important one, of the play. “This play is also about how we pursue the truth, interpret and explain it, and how we value it.” As the title of the play suggests, the concerns of women are often considered to be mere trifles, unimportant issues that bear little or no importance, while the “real work” was carried out by the men.
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional academic writers. You can view samples of our professional work here..
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
Trifles essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Trifles by Susan Glaspell.