Dr moynihan s iatrogenic government social policy

Social Class and National Government Essay introduction. WE can take the social rankings during the medieval time period and the social rankings of today and show how similar they are. We can also take the highest level of both social rankings and show how they have the same ideas, and standards.

Dr moynihan s iatrogenic government social policy

Pat Moynihan, President Nixon's domestic policy adviser, with a Harvard man's confidence in the efficacy of government, had just returned from prompting the French government to smash the ''French connection'' by which most heroin destined for America was refined from Turkish opium in Marseilles.

Moynihan's companion on the helicopter to Camp David was Labor Secretary George Shultz from the University of Chicago, home of flinty realism about the power of strong appetites to create markets in spite of the disapproval of governments. Moynihan happily told Mr. Shultz about his achievement in France.

Shultz with deflating dryness. Moynihan, ''this is a big event. Shultz, again not interrupting his paperwork to feign excitement. Moynihan, ''you think that so long as there is a demand for drugs, there will continue to be a supply.

Shultz replied, ''there's hope for you yet. Moynihan recognized the drug epidemic as yet another instance of ''the central experience of modern society,'' the disruption of society by technology. The environment is injured by technology; populations are displaced by technology; drivers and pedestrians are maimed by technology; cities are choked by technologies.

And cities are terrorized by the crime generated by the traffic in drugs that are products of technology. Products, to be precise, of 19th-century German organic chemists.

They produced morphine, a medicine that begat a monster. From it came a distillation that made users feel ''heroisch'' -- hence the name heroin.

From opium to morphine to heroin; from coca to cocaine to crack: We have climbed the technological ladder before, from wine and beer to brandy and gin. Distilled alcohol became a scourge of the 18th-century when the Renaissance invention of distillation met the abundance of grain produced by the agricultural revolution.

The public-health calamity of cheap gin was an important reason why London's population growth stagnated between and The second law passed by the first U. Congress imposed a tariff on Jamaican rum to encourage consumption of American whiskey.

Not much encouragement was needed. Americans commonly drank whiskey at breakfast and on through the day. Laborers digging the Erie Canal were given a quart of Monongahela whiskey a day, issued in eight four-ounce portions beginning at 6 a.

People thought this was healthy. But social learning occurred regarding alcohol. By the end of the 19th century the temperance movement had reduced per-capita alcohol consumption two-thirds. Then came Prohibition, a public-health success alcohol-related illnesses declined dramatically but with a high social cost in criminality.

Given current chemical technology -- note this qualification -- drug policy requires a choice between two nasty outcomes, a broad public-health problem resulting from legalization, or a more localized but devastating crime problem, particularly among vulnerable inner-city populations.

We have chosen the latter. However, we persist in pretending that we can make a ''cleaner'' choice -- interdiction of supply, bolstered by executions of drug ''kingpins. America's demand for cocaine can be supplied from 96 square miles of Latin America -- a patch the size of Milwaukee.

Interdiction may raise drug prices somewhat, but raising the price of a highly pleasurable and highly addictive substance may raise the rate of the crimes committed to procure the substance. Moynihan says that ''federal drug policy'' -- iatrogenic government -- ''is responsible for a degree of social regression for which there does not seem to be any equivalent in our history.

However, the senator says, the ''failure'' of our drug policy is the success of our strategy to avoid the public-health calamity that certainly would result from legalization.Dr.

Moynihan's Iatrogenic Government Social Policy and Drug Research: Article Analysis on “Iatrogenic Government ” The response to drug use in America and in some countries around the world seems to have an interesting history. Mr. Moynihan says that ''federal drug policy'' -- iatrogenic government -- ''is responsible for a degree of social regression for which there does not seem to be any equivalent in our history.''.

The government’s protection is very important to the running of our country but would not be possible if the poor, middle and upper classes did not pay axes to the state and national government.

Dr moynihan s iatrogenic government social policy

These taxes are what pay our soldiers, policemen, and firemen who put their lives on the line for the country. Daniel Patrick "Pat" Moynihan (March 16, – March 26, ) was an American politician, sociologist, and diplomat.A member of the Democratic Party, he represented New York in the United States Senate and served as an adviser to Republican U.S.

President Richard Nixon.. Born in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Moynihan moved at a young age to New York City. In the mids, a social scientist noted something ominous that came to be called “Moynihan’s Scissors”: Two lines on a graph crossed, replicating the blades of a scissors. The descending. The prescience of Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

Home | Opinion | National Columnist There has been what he called “iatrogenic government,” an iatrogenic ailment being one caused by a physician or medicine: Some welfare policies provided perverse incentives for absent fathers. “lies not in the formulation of social policy, but in the.

Social Policy and Drug Research Paper | Essay Writing Service A+